W3Cschool
恭喜您成為首批注冊(cè)用戶
獲得88經(jīng)驗(yàn)值獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)
NOTE: This plugin is included in @babel/preset-env, in ES2022
In
JavaScript
class Foo {
#bar = "bar";
test(obj) {
return #bar in obj;
}
}
Out
JavaScript
class Foo {
constructor() {
_bar.set(this, {
writable: true,
value: "bar",
});
}
test() {
return _bar.has(this);
}
}
var _bar = new WeakMap();
pnpm add --save-dev @babel/plugin-proposal-private-property-in-object
babel.config.json
{
"plugins": ["@babel/plugin-proposal-private-property-in-object"]
}
Shell
babel --plugins @babel/plugin-proposal-private-property-in-object
JavaScript
require("@babel/core").transformSync("code", {
plugins: ["@babel/plugin-proposal-private-property-in-object"],
});
boolean, defaults to false.
Note: The loose mode configuration setting must be the same as @babel/proposal-class-properties.
When true, private property in expressions will check own properties (as opposed to inherited ones) on the object, instead of checking for presence inside a WeakSet. This results in improved performance and debugging (normal property access vs .get()) at the expense of potentially leaking "privates" via things like Object.getOwnPropertyNames.
?? Consider migrating to the top level privateFieldsAsProperties assumption.
babel.config.json
{
"assumptions": {
"privateFieldsAsProperties": true,
"setPublicClassFields": true
}
}
Note that both privateFieldsAsProperties and setPublicClassFields must be set to true.
In
JavaScript
class Foo {
#bar = "bar";
test(obj) {
return #bar in obj;
}
}
Out
JavaScript
class Foo {
constructor() {
Object.defineProperty(this, _bar, {
writable: true,
value: "bar",
});
}
test() {
return Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(this, _bar);
}
}
var _bar = babelHelpers.classPrivateFieldLooseKey("bar");
You can read more about configuring plugin options here
Copyright©2021 w3cschool編程獅|閩ICP備15016281號(hào)-3|閩公網(wǎng)安備35020302033924號(hào)
違法和不良信息舉報(bào)電話:173-0602-2364|舉報(bào)郵箱:jubao@eeedong.com
掃描二維碼
下載編程獅App
編程獅公眾號(hào)
聯(lián)系方式:
更多建議: